Categories

Tag cloud

2.7 1000 BleepingComputer.com blogs categories CCS Coltrane Conscientious contest CSS CT-MATH Derivatrix DLSU EASE@Haven ELECOMM ENGLRES GearLive giveaway HP INTROSE iPhone istartedsomething jQuery laptop MICPRC1 Microsoft Mini Multiply Neowin netbook portfolio resolution tags themes touchscreen Twitter vacation web width WordPress

Everything you need.

Here’s something I’ve made up during the extreme boredom of classes. It’s a self-researched study that’s only dependent on my perception and observation. Please, don’t be bothered by the amount of immensely-complicated graphs and charts you will see below; I’ll help you in figuring them all out. Actually, they’re not really complicated at all.

Some things to take note: First, there’s no hypothesis to be made, because the things to be discussed here are already known to the reader; and second, this study might be completely inaccurate, since the variables shown are only based on observation.

Okay, so let’s start, with this graph:

The X axis in the graph refers to the number of months in time, while the Y axis refers to an arbitrary abstract metric. There are three levels in the graph: 1 through 99 (level 0), 100 through 199 (level 1), and 200 through 210 (level 2). According to my observations, there are a total of five classifications of people with events occurring throughout these levels, and thus, we call them S0, S1, S1-, S2, and S2-. (-) is composed of all the negative classes S1- and S2-.

Let’s start with the S2 family, consisting of S2 and S2-. These two classifications have the characteristics of being able to surpass all three levels. S2- only differs to S2 by its outcome; it reverts back to level 0 after an unidentified period of time. On the other hand, S2 stays above the level 2 boundary, and sticks to 210, the highest metric, indefinitely.

The S1 family, which consists of S1 and S1-, has the characteristic of being able to surpass both level 0 and level 1, but whether it approaches level 2 is unknown. S1- is similar to S2- by its outcome. (That’s why they’re called the negatives, right?) S1 has a very unique characteristic, though: It is able to approach level one, stays there, and continues to have a constant rate of increase, albeit small.

The last classification is called S0. It is also called the basic class, because this classification goes within level 0 only. (Level 0 can be considered as the basic level range.) Its characteristic is more like its limitation — this class cannot go beyond level 0 for unknown reasons.

It doesn’t stop there, though. There are age brackets, so I’m showing you the demographic-by-age chart here (might not be accurate):

It seems we can make some additional observations already, just by looking at the first graph. We can say that the negatives S1- and S2- might be considered as such because they started attempting too early in a specific period of time, compared to the normal S1 and S2. We can also say that S0 might be considered as such because they were way too late in attempting. 

So anyway, here are my conclusions:

First, I am in the S0 class. Second, I have been constantly experiencing the same class in the past eighty-four months, but I don’t want to be in the same class forever. And third, we do not want to be in the S1- class, much less in the S2- class.

More notes: It works in most abstract concepts, and class N0 was not included in the study. N0 is simply the class where it stays at zero (it’s not on any level).

So, my official code for this is S[0,0,0,0,0,0,0]. (This code is interpreted as: This person is in the S0 class since seven years ago, until present.) What’s yours? Oh, and don’t forget to put your own observations through posting comments.

Comments (1)

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Post a comment!

Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website